The complete operating system for Philippine law firms.
Research, documents, cases, clients, tasks — one platform that connects your entire practice. Built on a hundred and twenty years of Philippine jurisprudence.
An entire firm's working day, inside one private workspace.
Click through the five surfaces your firm will actually live in. Same paper, same ink, same rhythm as this briefing — because the product and this page were drawn from the same typecase.
Fig. 02 — The firm's daily briefing, on opening.
Four modules, in the order a working day actually runs.
Most legal-tech splits research, documents, cases, and tasks into separate products — and asks you to copy-paste between them. Causa is one continuous briefing, written for the way Philippine firms actually work.
Ask a question. Get an answer with verified citations.
Cleo searches over a hundred thousand Supreme Court decisions, codal provisions, and bar-syllabus doctrines in real time, drafts an answer, then checks every claim against its source before showing it to you. No hallucinated citations. No Anglo-American case law you don't need.
- ¶Hybrid BM25 + semantic retrieval across the official corpus
- ¶Citation verification — Cleo grades its own work, line by line
- ¶Deep research mode for novel or multi-issue questions
“What's the prescriptive period for an action on a written contract under PH law?”
Ten years from accrual, per Article 1144 of the Civil Code (RA 386). Reaffirmed in Cornista v. CA (G.R. 157881, 2008).
- RA 386Civil Code · Art. 1144verified
- G.R. 157881Cornista v. Court of Appeals (2008)verified
Fig. 02 — Module 01 exhibit.
Every pleading, contract, and notarial scan, sorted by what it is.
Upload, drop, or paste — Causa OCRs, classifies into one of thirty-nine Philippine document types, and links the file to its case automatically. Search by full text, by intent, by who edited what, when.
- ¶OCR for English and Filipino, scanned or digital
- ¶Auto-classification trained on Philippine pleading patterns
- ¶Folders, tags, comments, version history — everything kept
- №01Estate of Reyes — Affidavit of Self-Adjudication.docxv31h ago
- №02Castillo v. PLDT — Reply Brief.pdfv73h ago
- №03Memo — Annulment grounds (Art. 45 FC).docxv1yesterday
- №04Notarial book — Apr 2026.pdfscanApr 16
Fig. 03 — Module 02 exhibit.
A case folder that knows it's a case.
Documents, emails, deadlines, comments, parties — joined to the case that anchors them. Gmail captures emails to the right matter on receipt; the timeline reconstructs how the matter unfolded; the client profile keeps every party straight.
- ¶Gmail-to-case capture with party-type classification
- ¶Audit logs and role-based access on every action
- ¶Calendar deadlines linked to the underlying pleading
- !!active hearingEstate of Reyes v. ReyesG.R. 244629
- !filing due WedCastillo v. PLDTCiv. Case 4421
- ·discoveryPeople v. MendozaCrim. Case 2-9912
Fig. 04 — Module 03 exhibit.
Tasks, calendar, team. One day, one screen.
What's due today, who has it, what's blocking it. Assignments, reminders, and shared scheduling for the firm — without turning your associates into status-report generators or your partners into chasers.
- ¶Daily briefing surfaces what matters before you ask
- ¶Shared calendar with deadline-aware reminders
- ¶Granular permissions for principals, associates, and staff
- Castillo motion — file by 4 PM
- Estate of Reyes — call client
- Annulment memo — review v2
Fig. 05 — Module 04 exhibit.
Six entries in today's edition.
Every capability Causa ships, listed plainly. No marketing pillars, no "AI-first" rhetoric — read the entry, decide for yourself.
Hybrid retrieval across 102K+ Supreme Court decisions, codal provisions, and bar-syllabus doctrines. Citation verification, deep research mode, source filters.
Upload, OCR, auto-classify, search. Folders mirror case structure; versioning preserves every revision. PDF, DOCX, scans — English or Filipino.
A canonical case file. Documents, emails, parties, deadlines, comments — joined to the matter that anchors them. Gmail captures email-to-case automatically.
What's due, who has it, what's blocking it. Deadline-aware reminders linked to the underlying pleading. One day, one screen.
Granular permissions for principals, associates, and staff. Activity feed, comment resolution, presence — without turning your team into status reporters.
Encryption at rest and in transit, audit logs on every action, role-based access, attorney-client privilege protection. Hosted in a region you can name.
Sourced from the official record.
Causa indexes only first-party authority — Supreme Court decisions, the Official Gazette, the e-Library. No third-party legal-mill blogs, no AI-generated commentary, no Anglo-American case law smuggled in as precedent. If you can't cite it, we don't carry it.
The full citation list, by source. Causa cross-checks every Cleo answer against this corpus before showing it to you.
- Decisions since 1901Supreme Court of the Philippinessc.judiciary.gov.ph
- 18 categories, synced nightlySupreme Court e-Libraryelibrary.judiciary.gov.ph
- Laws, EOs, proclamationsOfficial Gazette of the Republicofficialgazette.gov.ph
- Codal — full textCivil Code of the PhilippinesRepublic Act 386
- Codal — full textFamily Code of the PhilippinesExecutive Order 209
- Codal — full textRevised Penal CodeAct No. 3815
Request a seat in today's edition.
Causa is in private beta with a small number of Philippine firms. We're looking for a few more — solo practitioners, mid-size firms, in-house counsel — who want to shape what the daily briefing becomes.
- Onboardingwhite-glove with the founder
- Beta costfree during the beta period
- Data residencyPhilippine region only
- Cancel anytimeyour data exports cleanly